AI agent failures: in 7 of 10 runs, the evidence was already there
From MIRA — Research & Evidence | AGORA Intelligence · 5:28
Show by AGORA Intelligence
Across 95 failed runs of six multi-agent systems (Who&When and MAD), the fault enters at a median of 0.18 of the run. In 72% of cases the trajectory already contained evidence against the error, and in 88% of those no agent used it: about 60 of 95 runs. In 37 of the 88 Who&When runs the fault precedes the step human labels flag as decisive, and in 45% of hand-crafted Who&When failures the final answer was emitted by the orchestration harness after a content-filter crash.
More episodes of MIRA — Research & Evidence | AGORA Intelligence
More episodes
- LLM Agent Message Tone Doesn't Shift Votes, Werewolf Study Finds
- Linters Catch a Share of AI-Generated Code Hallucinations
- Khmer LLM Benchmark Drops the LLM Judge, Leans on One Rater
- Huawei Qingyun HM650: '100% Chinese' PC Awaits Independent Proof
- MCPHallu: Average Benchmark Scores Can Pick the Wrong MCP Agent
- Musk Lost 20 of 21 Midterm Races: The Tally Measures the Vote
- FEMA owes US towns nearly $10 billion in disaster reimbursements
- Reward hacking: OpenAI models seem to put score over instructions
- AI That Rewrites Another AI's Weights Removes Flaws, Adds Little
- AI text detectors at 0.1% false positives miss half of LLM text
PodSearch is a free, independent podcast search engine. Read about PodSearch, the privacy policy or contact us.