Episode 35 | Transfer Of Knowledge

From The Knowledge Architects: Building Wisdom in the Information Age · 18:05

Show by ElysFlow

AI-generated audio: the two voices and their conversation in this episode are created by AI. The hosts are not real people.How we make it: our team chooses each topic and edits the audio. The research and these notes are drafted with AI and read by us before publishing.Why AI? It lets us bring peer-reviewed science to you for free, in English and German. Sources are below.Episode SummaryIn 1983, three psychologists asked people to rate a list of sentences for truthfulness. One of them read: "Before any game is played, there is no score." Five minutes later, the same people were handed twelve puzzles, one of which asked how a psychic could predict the score of any baseball game before it starts. People who had never seen the sentences solved 19 percent of the puzzles. People who had just read the answers solved 29 percent, which is not a reliable difference. Then a third group was told the sentences might help. Fifty four percent. Same room, same session, same information. The knowledge was in there. It simply never came out.This episode is about transfer of learning, the question of whether knowledge acquired in one place is any use in another, and it is the reason education exists. We run it as a trial, because the field itself does: the standard book is called Transfer on Trial, its central sceptical chapter is "The Case for the Prosecution", and the leading defence calls the standard laboratory test "sequestered problem solving". The prosecution's case is strong and a century old. Then three things complicate it. The failure turns out to be at retrieval rather than application, the cell of the evidence table that would justify general education has never been filled, and the doctrine Thorndike is credited with killing turns out to be partly true.Key Topics CoveredThe trial frame: Transfer on Trial (1993), "The Case for the Prosecution", and "sequestered problem solving"The doctrine of mental discipline before 1901: the Yale Report of 1828, Locke's Conduct of the Understanding, and why the standard story about faculty psychology runs backwardsWilliam James testing the doctrine on himself in 1890 with Victor Hugo, and coming out 14 percent worseWhat Thorndike and Woodworth actually did in 1901: a handful of people estimating the areas of paper rectangles, then tested on triangles, with n = 5 in the letter marking studyWhat their paper never mentions: formal discipline, Latin, Greek, or any school subject at allThorndike's 1924 mental discipline study, and the enrolment data showing the classical curriculum did not collapse when the story says it didJudd's 1908 address, the counter tradition's most cited exhibit, which reports three numbers and no data at allDuncker's radiation problem, and the version everyone quotes that Duncker never wroteGick and Holyoak, condition by condition: roughly 30 percent spontaneous transfer, roughly 75 percent with a hintDetterman's prosecution case, the mule and the baseball bat, and the line he never actually wroteBarnett and Ceci's taxonomy of far transfer, its sixty four cells, and the empty oneWhitehead's inert knowledge, named in 1929, and the ninety years the field spent catching up to itThe payload: transfer fails at retrieval, not at application (Gentner, Rattermann and Forbus; Perfetto, Bransford and Franks)The modern far transfer nulls across working memory training, chess, music, video games and bilingualismThe 2025 trial in 572 German first graders that runs the other way, and the missing active control that explains whyFormal discipline partially vindicated: statistics training transfers, formal logic does not, and the rule that separates themWhat actually makes knowledge travel: case comparison, asking for similarities, stating the principle afterwards, and problem oriented encodingThe zombie statistic: "only 10 percent of training transfers to the job", traced back to a rhetorical questionResearchers MentionedEdward L. Thorndike (1874 to 1949, Teachers College, Columbia) : identical elements, the 1901 experiments and the 1924 mental discipline study; his own last word was "The question is one of quantity"Robert S. Woodworth (1869 to 1962, Columbia) : co author of the 1901 papers, and first author on the earliest printed definition of identical elementsWilliam James (1842 to 1910, Harvard) : the 1890 memory self experiment that Thorndike later citedCharles H. Judd (1873 to 1946, University of Chicago) : the counter tradition and the submerged target study; also the sharpest early critic of the identical elements ideaPedro T. Orata : the vote counting reviews that declared transfer "a fact, as revealed by nearly eighty percent of the studies"William C. Bagley : defender of disciplinary functions, and the man who retracted his own studyKarl Duncker (1903 to 1940) : the radiation problem, published in German in 1935 and in English in 1945Mary L. Gick and Keith J. Holyoak (UCLA) : analogical problem solving (1980) and schema induction (1983), the two most cited…

More episodes of The Knowledge Architects: Building Wisdom in the Information Age

More episodes

PodSearch is a free, independent podcast search engine. Read about PodSearch, the privacy policy or contact us.